Friday 26 August 2016

Herdsmen's Attacks Claim At Least 1260 Lives in Benue And Provoke Tears in Enugu

Reports about raids on defenseless Nigerian communities by Fulani herdsmen have become so common, and therefore normal that they hardly attract the expected human sympathy, shock, or anger that they should. Read HERE an investigative report about the killings in Benue State by Fulani herdsmen, and see that there is no government in spite of Buhari's recent statement that he would no longer allow Fulani herdsmen to attack communities. Exactly, what steps has Buhari taken to wed his statement with action? I cannot tell. Also, few days ago, Fulani herdsmen again launched another attack in Enugu State, again causing death, injuries and destruction. The Enugu State governor again shed tears, and that's all? Would he again go to Aso Rock to bend in obeisance to stolid indifference?

Hours before I decided to post this, while passing through a community in Edo State, I saw a Vigilante member carrying a sophisticated gun as he and colleagues kept vigilance over their community. On their truck doors I read, "Okpella Community Vigilante". I wondered why my State (Benue) Governor Ortom appears too timorous to provide such community defense shield for Benue Communities. Why can't the other States under Fulani herdsmen invasion be brave, daring and proactive in providing adequate and sophisticated defense shield for the people now that the Federal Government is too preoccupied with Boko Haram and Niger Delta insurgencies to protect a soul in their States?  Maybe State Security votes should now be applied in a manner that justifies the phrase. Now is the time to dare those that expect the governors, the chief security officers of their States, to equip vigilante groups to save lives Buhari is too weak, incapacitated, or unwilling to protect.  Maybe, State Police would rightly emerge thereby. My respect for any government would vanish if it cannot protect lives, just any lives.

Why some Nigerian governors would be afraid to defend their people against the Fulani pogrom:

1. Their hands are not clean, and would therefore not force Buhari to unleash the EFCC against them who would apply to them the Fayose treatment.
My Response: They should rather resign.

2. APC governors would like to remain loyal party members, and must not be "antagonizing" President Buhari.
My Response: Are they loyal then to the blood of their patriots that now cries against their indirect complicity and duplicity?

3.. The governors don't want to lose the "goodwill" of the Federal Government.
My Response: Do they know the meaning of goodwill? Can they yearn for the goodwill of the man that repeatedly rapes their wife or daughters?

4. The governors are afraid of assassination or loss of political relevance.
My Response: Are they not dead already through their cowardice? Does not Mangakis teach us that the man dies who is afraid to speak up in the face of oppression? And why are they concerned about preserving what already they have lost through their insipid lamentations and tears of helplessness?


Sunday 14 August 2016

Nigeria's Middle Belt: A Quiet Giant?

Nigeria has always remained at a crossroads. The Middle Belt region, to which I belong by birth, is no doubt a giant, but not so obvious to those who don't think so deeply about Nigeria's socio-political dynamics. The region always votes for the government at the center; and unless President Buhari and his minders behind the scene understand this and take steps of appeasement now ( e.g. speedily stop the offensive Fulani cattle breeders from assaulting the Belt, bring about their economic  inclusion, etc.,) APC should forget winning the votes of the Belt for the presidency in 2019. There is seething anger among the people, and they still possess their PVCs.

But this article,  Middle Belt, The Glue of Nigeria chronicles probably contentious issues about Nigeria. Although published more than four years ago, those remain relevant today, especially now that Buhari's government has thrown caution to the wind in the egregious abuse of Section 14 of the Constitution, his Fulani cattle herders kill defenseless Nigerians at will, the Niger Delta  militants are blowing up oil infrastructure, the Igbos are restless about being sidelined, the news and social media have started being muzzled by Buhari,  and even Buhari's supporters have started apologizing to Nigerians for convincing them to vote for Buhari.

See you again.

Saturday 13 August 2016

On Nigerians, Religion, and Everything In-between

Leonard Shilgba

I affirm from the beginning that I believe in the existence of God, in the teachings of Jesus Christ, who is the Way, the Truth, and the Life, and that I must do to others exactly as I expect them to do to me. And if I am not so sure how I expect to be treated in certain circumstances, then I should fall upon the principle of moral compounds, which insists on the inseparable bonds between the pairs, peace and righteousness, and mercy and truth.

The deplorable state of Nigeria in almost every facet of life, in spite of plenty of religion, has driven not a few along the road of inquisition on the existence of God or his willingness and ability to make good happen. There are some who believe that society is capable of self-regulation and creating its own set of goodness without God; and they view religion with suspicion and disdain, as a weapon of cruel control and manipulation that sentences reason to perpetual custodian restriction while generously planting the seed of faith without examination, reason or enquiry. Does truth depend on obedience? Can we judge God's existence or kindness by the quality of conduct of the people who claim to worship Him? Do children always follow the path of their virtuous parents? If not, does their contradictory conduct vitiate their parents' testimony of virtue?

I have read quite a few articles and comments by some Nigerians, who, because of the undeniable existence of many Nigerian preachers that serve their bellies only but not Christ, whom they derisively call "pastorpreneurs", have come to deny the very existence of God ( without attempting to define what they now deny exists). Some Nigerians, claiming to be "secular humanists" today, once confessed faith in Jesus Christ; but what made them to recant? One of them asserts a reason, that a once close acquaintance of his, with whom he sang in a Deeper Life Campus Fellowship, was struck with cancer. And despite their prayers, she died. He therefore does not believe prayer works, except that it makes someone to feel "good" about themselves. First of all, what answered prayer informed his confessed faith in Christ at the beginning? We have asked our parents for certain things that they withheld from us, for some undisclosed reasons, but did we come to deny our parents existed? This fellow affirms death to be a universal and inevitable experience of which he claims absence of fear. But did he consider that cancer too is one means through which death takes people away? Or does he question the fact that God (whose existence he now denies) permits death at all? I think I have some experiences of not getting many things I have asked God in prayer for: In 1997, my mother died of cancer right in my house. I had prayed to God and wept before Him that she should live. I was a pastor of a Deeper Life Campus Fellowship. Yet, she died at a young age of 49! Should I, on account of that, deny the efficacy of prayer and the existence of God? Before she died, she told me one day when I returned from my university campus ( I was a very young lecturer at the Ahmadu Bello University Zaria at that time) that Jesus had appeared to her and told her not to fear, and that I, her son, was his friend. She asked God to take her away ( She also had confessed faith in Jesus Christ even as I did). In 2002, my beloved father also died while I was in faraway Japan, and this in spite of my prayers and those of my fellow brethren at the Tokyo Baptist Church, that he would overcome his ailment. Thereafter, I lost about three siblings back home in Nigeria. Did I not have good cause to renounce my faith therefore? No, I did not. If we build our faith in God's existence and goodness around events of our life and the world, it is because we don't know him; and this is the tragedy of religion, ignorance about God. If we knew God, we should know that God does everything (not some things) according to the counsel of his will. In other words, God always subordinates his power to his will. He does not just grant every wish of man just because he can. What God cannot do is to break his will. No matter how great your faith is, it can never be preferred above God's will. All our desires must be prefaced by "Let thy will be done." This is true religion. And man's noble duty is inclusive of knowing God's will. For those who despise the affirmation of God's existence, let me appeal for a simple definition, that God is the creator of all things, visible and invisible; whether they are thrones or dominions. Except you believe that you created yourself, you should be concerned about the source of creation. The very fact that someone gave birth to you means there is a creative power behind our universe. Belief in some evolution theory or the Big bang is starting the narrative in the middle. Assuming these to be true, what creative force was behind the evolution (which there is no evidence today of its continuance) or the Big bang?

Jesus Christ taught about love, forgiveness and mercy. He also taught about true righteousness, different from that of the nauseating righteousness established by the religious folks of his time on earth. He never discriminated between men and women. Men touched him, and women did too, and were part of his ministry life on earth. The first evangelist he sent out to bring forth the message of his resurrection was a woman. He offered protection to a woman who was about to be stoned because her accusers claimed she was caught in the act of adultery ( but where was the male sexual partner?). Jesus Christ therefore is against misogynism. Jesus had married folks like Peter in his team of top disciples. Therefore, he is not in support of misogamy either. He stood against child abuse and ordered that they should not be stopped from coming to him. He taught that greatness is in service, and not being served. He openly and actively was against exploitation of religion for filthy lucre. He exposed the hypocrisy and greed of the religious leaders, and once physically drove out of his "Father's house" those who had turned the "house of prayer" into a "den of robbers." Today, we have many of such robbers plying their trade on street corners and in huge camp grounds in Nigeria. Would you speak against Jesus' Way because of those who are not in His Way? That would spit logic in the face, wouldn't it? If you despise the false religious activities in Nigeria today,so does Jesus also, who  was not timid, who did not only pray but also spoke against the evil of the religious. But he was gentle on the weak and remorseful. A bruised reed Jesus would not break, and a smoldering flax he would not quench. He said to the adulterous woman, "Neither do I condemn you, but go and sin no more." So she received both forgiveness and power to go and sin no more. Jesus never encourages living in sin, but freedom from it. He came to set man free from fear of death. Jesus taught the nobility of planning without worrying about the future. He taught that man must count the cost before embarking on any venture.

Jesus Christ warned against deception by false prophets and murderers (terrorists), who would kill, thinking they are doing God service. He says we can know false prophets by the evil fruits they bear. He demands good fruits of character from those who profess to follow him, saying, "You are my friends if you do whatsoever I command you." Has it ever occurred to you that Jesus did not give a label to his followers? He said to some that he called, "Follow me, and I will make you fishers of men." He taught his disciples on prayer and urged them to pray that the "Lord of the harvest (of men)" should send more laborers into the harvest field. In our day, we need skillful fishers
 of men, planters, waterers, reapers, and master builders. But only God gives the increase on our labors. Prayers of faith  made in accordance with God's will, in agreement with, not only his eternal purpose, but also timing, always are answered, because we keep his commandments and do the things that please him.

If someone wants to argue against the existence of God or the veracity of the Bible, it would be inappropriate to situate the argument in the context of the "gods of men" in Nigeria, who are erroneously called "men of God". Jesus Christ's stand against them is evident in the scriptures. I must quickly address some burning issues, which have been trending on social media lately:

First, the Bible encourages investigation of prophecies or teachings by listerners. We are taught therein to not believe every prophecy, but "test the spirits". You cannot test if you are uninformed. Is this not similar to the expectations in all sciences? For instance,  I am a professor of Mathematics, teacher and pastor; and I follow this principle of investigation, verification and conclusion based on evidence, which must agree with certain axioms (a set of inviolate fundamental principles). And all followers of Christ must study to discover or verify. We are not called to blind faith, suspended reasoning or more ignorance. Rather, the testimony of God's Word is that the deep or solid meat of God's Word  is for those who "by reason of use (of the Word) have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil." [Hebrews 5: 14] The scriptures deplore a state of ignorance. Disciples of Christ are in fact, commanded to study and give diligence to build up on faith virtue, knowledge, self-control, patience, godliness, brotherly kindness, and love in that order. The presence of all these in a life, family or society guarantees fruitfulness. But, how much of these do we have in Nigeria, our States, Local Government  Areas or Wards?

Mahatma Gandhi once lamented to a "Christian" missionary that, "Christians are very much unlike Christ." Labels do not matter, and Jesus Christ did not care for them.

 Before Western missionaries came to Africa, slavery was a common occurence on the continent, oppresive African kings executed their subjects in the most cruel manner, and women were tradable objects and treated only  a little better than slaves. African kings wielded total control over their subjects. Therefore, to pin African woes on the entry of "Western religion", foreign religion, and the consequent step-down from "traditional African religions or gods" is to revise history.

Yes, in the Old Testament, God, working with Israel as a "son", demonstrated how jealously he guards and protects His own. He sacrificed whole nations for them, thus even children were not spared sometimes among "enemies" of Israel. All non-Jewish nations were considered as aliens, without God in the world, and separate from God. Even at that, God still selectively used non-Jews for His purposes (e.g. Balaam, Nebuchadnezzar, Cyrus, etc.). Furthermore, at different times, and sometimes spanning decades, because of God's anger against Israel's idolatry, he either allowed foregn nations to oppress them or dispersed them away from the Land He had given them.

 Today, men and women hold various standards of right and wrong. But it seems to me that mere mortals assume certain powers to determine for God what is right or wrong. For instance, while some believe they are free to enjoy their sexuality and express it anywhere and in any way they want, they take umbrage at those that uphold beliefs contrary to theirs. Jesus Christ has not given his followers the commandment or mandate to kill, discriminate against or ridicule people for their sexual orientation. But, they are commanded to warn lesbians, gays or the bisexual about the eternal consequences of their actions, and to show them the path of freedom. Free will and modern liberties are a personal choice, but the consequences thereof cannot be chosen or determined by man. Those that will not listen to us (Jesus' followers) must not be considered personal enemies. We must dust our feet and move on to others. The "secular humanist" took a potshot at God, wondering why He would demand we "forgive our enemies 490 times", but He would not forgive His enemy Satan. Let me ask him to find out when Satan repented and asked for forgiveness from God. Except repentance happens there is no forgiveness; that is God's way, even as Jesus Christ tells His disciples, "If your brother offends you 490 times in a day, and 490 times repents and asks for forgiveness, forgive."  God sets the rules, while man chooses to comply or otherwise; and there are consequences for mockery or disobedience, and you can't beat that.

In the New Testament, individuals are brought into personal Father-child relationship with God, and He guards them jealously. God does not demand undivided obedience or worship because He feels insecure. He that made man for His pleasure and purpose, does He not deserve such? Those who allege that God, by demanding undivided loyalty and worship, has a feeling of insecurity, must demonstrate they could share their spouses with just anyone else without any harrowing emotions.

Someone asked, "When Jesus Christ was in the grave, who watched over the earth?" This question was asked with the intention of ridiculing the claim that Jesus Christ is God in the flesh. My answer is simple; even in the grave Jesus is Lord.

Science is throwing up many discoveries of certain planets that we did not know about a few decades ago. Man has not been to many of them, but some equipment invented by man have provided the evidence. And although billions of people have not been to those planets, they believe the "evidence" of science, and talk freely about those planetary bodies. How then will the same man simply say, "Well, the scriptures are simple fabrications of Jewish people"?  Can't I insist that unless I first go to those planets that man has never landed upon, the scientific literature about them are mere fabrications of scientists?

Nigerians must give themselves to study or learning, and cease from vulgar language as substitute when logical reasoning is absent in the mind.  Nigerians must speak up against evil, even as Jesus Christ did, and not simply hide their cowardice in prayer without genuine faith. We must strive for a character without reproach for the good of our society instead of questioning on labels: "Are you a Christian or Muslim?" Between Nigerians and religion we have a few that groan for a nation of Truth, where we do not discriminate against ourselves because of religion or tribe, one a choice, the other by birth (without choice). In-between are Nigerians that hate the tensions being built up across Nigeria because of insidious discriminations in violation of the Constitution. And in-between is the Nigerian and African reader who agrees with me at least ninety per cent!






Monday 8 August 2016

Unveiling Sponsors of Violence in the Niger Delta

 This report on Saharareporters:Goodluck Jonathan and Partners Behind Niger Delta Avengers  contains some personalities that the Reformed Niger Delta Avengers (RNDA), a splinter group from the infamous Niger Delta Avengers ( NDA), has revealed as sponsors of the primitive destruction of oil infrastructure and environmental pollution in the Niger Delta by the Niger Delta Avengers ( NDA). If there is a just government in Nigeria, if the avowed fight against corruption by President Buhari is genuine, and if there is no anarchy in Nigeria, then Nigerians must see intelligent use of this information by Nigeria's security agencies for Nigeria's peace and development. Our economy is being shut down by such economic saboteurs, who have not either  by their past or present actions improved the livelihood of Niger Deltans. For instance, we are only being told how in eight years of its existence, the Ministry of Niger Delta Affairs has "completed only one project."

Under President Buhari, hunger, anger and danger are on the increase (apologies to Father Mbaka). Naira has crashed and thus real incomes of Nigerians have crashed. Public electricity supply has become a joke even as Nigerians are still being forced to pay outrageous bills for more darkness, and yet Buhari's government justifies this corrupt conduct of DISCOS in spite of appeals by people like us for his intervention. Inflation has hit the roof, and Buhari's government has openly confessed that Nigeria is now stuck in a recession. Now, if Buhari and his friends blame all these on Jonathan, and the RNDA has come out to give the names of Jonathan and company as sponsors of an egregious economic sabotage, then Buhari should either go after them or quit the blame game. Nigerians want a government that will act responsibly and courageously to protect them, and not one that talks tough but acts sparingly and discriminatively  in latent fear. It is one thing, for instance, to say, "My government cannot tolerate the violence by cattle herders," and yet the herders are killing in Benue State, amassing weapons to destroy Nigerian lives, and all threats to punish never scare the blood spillers, and quite another to act quietly while the people taste the good fruits openly. I hope Buhari has not lost control of Nigeria even as some of his friends are now losing confidence in his abilities and sense of justice and feeling of empathy for poor Nigerians. Can PMB act now in our public interest or will he protect a few criminals for special group interest? The story script is gradually becoming manifest. But let me give PMB one more chance to redeem himself. Thereafter, if he fails, then…..

Wednesday 3 August 2016

Nigerians Say Hunger and Poverty are Unbearable

Father Mbaka has spoken out the truth to President Buhari, that Nigerians, remaining hungry and hopelessly poor is a grave danger to his government. True friends tell truth to one another. The Word of God says, "Better are the wounds of a friend than the kisses of an enemy."

You may have read on this blog the trending and damning facts about Buhari's nepotism and stolid disregard to constructive criticism. Now, added to that list is the issue of hunger and poverty in the land that the people experience in increasing degrees. Furthermore, death is having a field day, being ferried across the land by many vehicles, chief among which are the Fulani cattle herders, who maul hapless Nigerians on their ancestral lands while Buhari stands by watching in annoying silence.
Now, even Buhari's friends can't hold their peace anymore until he starts changing course and acting as president of all Nigerians.
This is what Nigerians are saying.

Prof. Junaid Mohammed on Buhari's Nepotism

Professor Junaid Mohammed in an interview with the Punch newspaper painted a disturbing picture of President Buhari as a man that is neck deep in the corruption of nepotism. Moreover, he makes the conclusion that both Buhari's government and reputation are in danger in the hands of what he calls Daura Cabal. If Prof. Mohammed is right, then PMB has only dug himself an unnecessary hole from which he must quickly extricate himself NOW. Could this be what Senate President Saraki referred to when he implied PMB was being controlled by a cabal? If all you read below is true, this is not what Nigerians bargained for, and it is time the president changed course even at the cost of offending his family in government. He is president of Nigeria and not of the cabal:

Prof Junaid Mohammed: Buhari is corruptly nepotistic

Monday 1 August 2016